当前位置:首页 / 腹腔镜下阴道顶端耻骨梳韧带悬吊术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效▲
论著 | 更新时间:2026-07-08
|
腹腔镜下阴道顶端耻骨梳韧带悬吊术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效▲
Efficacy of laparoscopic vaginal apex pectineal ligament suspension combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse

微创医学 页码:317-323

作者机构:河南科技大学附属许昌中心医院妇科,河南省许昌市 461000

基金信息:▲基金项目:许昌市重点研发与推广专项(科技攻关)项目(编号:2024033)

DOI:10.11864/j.issn.1673.2026.03.08

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 探讨腹腔镜下阴道顶端耻骨梳韧带悬吊术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗中重度盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的临床疗效。方法 选取90例中重度POP患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组45例。观察组采用腹腔镜下阴道顶端耻骨梳韧带悬吊术联合阴道前后壁修补术;对照组采用腹腔镜下高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术联合阴道前后壁修补术。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术中膀胱损伤发生率、留置导尿管时间、术后新发尿失禁发生率及术后住院时间。分别在术前、术后1个月、术后3个月及术后6个月,比较两组盆腔器官脱垂定量分度法(POP-Q)评分情况,应用盆底功能障碍问卷(PFDI-20)评价盆底功能。结果 观察组手术时间长于对照组,术后住院时间、留置导尿管时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,术后新发尿失禁发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);术后3个月、6个月,观察组POP-Q分度优于对照组(P<0.05)。术后1个月、3个月及6个月,两组泌尿道功能困扰量表、盆腔器官脱垂障碍问卷、直肠肛门功能困扰问卷得分低于术前,且观察组上述维度得分低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 与腹腔镜下高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术联合阴道前后壁修补术相比,采用腹腔镜下阴道顶端耻骨梳韧带悬吊术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗POP可缩短住院时间,更好地矫正POP,改善盆底相关症状并减少术后新发尿失禁,利于盆底功能康复。

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic vaginal apex pectineal ligament suspension combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy for moderate to severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods Ninety patients with moderate to severe POP were selected as the study subjects and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group using the random number table method, with 45 cases in each group. The observation group underwent laparoscopic vaginal apex pectineal ligament suspension combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy. The control group received laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy. The two groups were compared in terms of operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of intraoperative bladder injury, duration of indwelling urinary catheter, incidence of new-onset postoperative urinary incontinence and postoperative hospital stay. Both the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) and pelvic floor function assessed by the pelvic floor distress inventory-short form (PFDI-20) were compared applied at four time points: preoperatively, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Results The observation group had a longer operative duration than the control group. Meanwhile, it showed shorter postoperative hospital stay, shorter duration of indwelling urinary catheter, less intraoperative blood loss, and a lower incidence of new-onset postoperative urinary incontinence (P<0.05). At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, POP-Q staging in the observation group was superior to that in the control group (P<0.05). At 1 month, 3 month, and 6 months postoperatively, the scores of urinary distress inventory-6, pelvic organ prolapse distress inventory-6, and colorectal-anal distress inventory-8 in both groups were lower than their preoperative scores, and the observation group's scores of the above three subscales were lower than the control group's (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy, laparoscopic vaginal pettineal ligament suspension combined with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy for POP can shorten postoperative hospital stay, achieve better correction of POP, relieve pelvic floor-related symptoms, reduce new-onset postoperative urinary incontinence, and facilitate the recovery of plevic floor function.

20

浏览量

3

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集