当前位置:首页 / 基于3D打印可视化结合跗骨窦切口微创置钉治疗跟骨骨折的临床研究▲
论著 | 更新时间:2025-02-27
|
基于3D打印可视化结合跗骨窦切口微创置钉治疗跟骨骨折的临床研究▲
Clinical study of minimally invasive screw placement through tarsal sinus incision combined with 3D printing visualization for calcaneous fracture

微创医学 页码:631-636

作者机构:九江市中医医院 1骨二科,2影像科,3骨一科,江西省九江市 332000

基金信息:▲基金项目:江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目(编号:202311584)

DOI:10.11864/j.issn.1673.2024.06.07

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 探讨基于3D打印可视化结合跗骨窦切口微创置钉治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效。方法 选取2020年5月至2023年6月在九江市中医医院接受治疗的60例跟骨骨折患者为研究对象,利用随机数字表法将患者分为3D打印组和L形切口组,每组30例。L形切口组予微创置钉术治疗,3D打印组基于3D打印技术进行术前规划后给予微创置钉术治疗。比较两组患者的手术情况、疼痛情况、踝足关节功能、跟骨力线解剖学参数以及并发症发生情况。结果 3D打印组手术切口长度、手术时间短于L形切口组,术中出血量少于L形切口组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。3D打印组术后1年美国足踝外科协会踝足评分及Maryland评分均高于L形切口组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。术前、术后,两组患者的跟骨宽度、跟骨高度、Bohler角及Gissane角差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与术前相比,术后两组患者的跟骨宽度缩窄,跟骨高度增加,Bohler角和Gissane角均增大,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。3D打印组术后并发症发生率为6.67%(2/30),L形切口组术后并发症发生率为20.00%(6/30),组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 基于3D打印可视化结合跗骨窦切口微创置钉治疗跟骨骨折有助于缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量,促进患者术后踝足关节功能恢复。

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive screw placement through tarsal sinus incicision combined with 3D printing visualization for calcaneous fracture. Methods Sixty patients with calcaneous fracture who received treatment at Jiujiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2020 to June 2023 were selected as the study objects. These patients were divided into the 3D printing group and the L-shaped incision group by the random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. The L-shaped incision group was treated with minimally invasive screw placement, and the 3D printing group was treated with minimally invasive screw placement after preoperative planning based on 3D printing technology. The surgical outcomes, pain status, ankle and foot joint functions, anatomical parameters of the calcaneus alignment, and the occurrence of complications were compared between the two groups of patients. Results The length of the surgical incision and the operation time in the 3D printing group were shorter than those in the L-shaped incision group, and the intraoperative blood loss in the 3D printing group was less than that in the L-shaped incision group, with all these differences being statistically significant (all P<0.05). One year after the operation, both the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-foot score and the Maryland score in the 3D printing group were higher than those in the L-shaped incision group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in calcaneal width, calcaneal height, Bohler's angle, and Gissane's angle between the two groups either before or after operation (all P>0.05). Compared with the preoperative state, in both groups after the operation, the calcaneal width became narrower, the calcaneal height increased, and both the Bohler's angle and Gissane's angle enlarged, with all the differences being statistically significant (all P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 6.67% (2/30) in the 3D printing group and 20.00% (6/30) in the L-shaped incision group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Minimally invasive screw placement through tarsal sinus incision combined with 3D printing visualization for treating calcaneous fractures can help shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and promote the recovery of postoperative ankle and foot joint function in patients. 


160

浏览量

26

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集