当前位置:首页 / 经导管动脉灌注化疗栓塞术治疗恶性腹水的短期疗效▲
论著 | 更新时间:2025-02-27
|
经导管动脉灌注化疗栓塞术治疗恶性腹水的短期疗效▲
Short-term efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in treating malignant ascites

微创医学 页码:614-619

作者机构:1 南宁市第一人民医院,广西南宁市 530022;2 广西中医药大学第一附属医院,广西南宁市 530023

基金信息:▲基金项目:广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(编号:Z-A20221128) *通信作者

DOI:10.11864/j.issn.1673.2024.06.04

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 探讨经导管动脉灌注化疗栓塞术治疗晚期恶性肿瘤所致恶性腹水的短期疗效。方法 回顾性分析南宁市第一人民医院2021年1月至2023年6月收治的60例恶性肿瘤伴恶性腹水患者的临床资料,其中接受常规化疗的30例患者纳入对照组,同期接受经导管动脉灌注化疗栓塞术治疗,且一般资料与对照组患者均衡可比的30例患者纳入观察组。治疗两个周期后,比较两组患者恶性腹水的治疗效果、血清学标志物[癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原(CA)125、CA153、CA199]水平、生活质量及不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组恶性腹水的治疗效果明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者的血清CEA、CA125、CA153、CA199水平差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);治疗后,两组患者的血清CEA、CA125、CA153、CA199水平均降低,且观察组水平低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者的Karnofsky功能状态(KPS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组患者的KPS评分明显高治疗前,并高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。对照组治疗前后的KPS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者的食欲减退、呕吐、腹泻、腹痛、骨髓抑制、肝肾功能损害等症状发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 经导管动脉灌注化疗栓塞术治疗恶性腹水的效果显著,能有效降低血液肿瘤学指标,提高患者生活质量,且未增加明显不良反应,是治疗恶性腹水的有效手段。

Objective To investigate the short-term efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in treating malignant ascites caused by advanced malignant tumors. Methods Clinical data of 60 patients with malignant tumors with malignant ascites in the First People's Hospital of Nanning from January 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 30 patients who received conventional chemotherapy were included in the control group. Thirty patients who received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization at the corresponding period and whose general data were comparable and balanced with those of the patients in the control group were included in the observation group. After two cycles of treatment, the treatment effect of malignant ascites, the levels of serological markers (carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], carbonhydrate antigen [CA] 125, CA153, CA199), the quality of life, and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The treatment effect of malignant ascites in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the serum levels of CEA, CA125, CA153, and CA199 between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05). After treatment, the serum levels of CEA, CA125, CA153, and CA199 in both groups decreased. Moreover, the levels in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and all the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05). After treatment, the KPS scores of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those before treatment and also higher than those of the control group, with all differences being statistically significant (all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the KPS scores of the control group before and after treatment (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, bone marrow suppression, liver and kidney function damage between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization has a remarkable effect in treating malignant ascites, which can effectively reduce hematological oncology indicators, improve the patients' quality of life, and does not cause obvious additional adverse reactions. Therefore, it is an effective method for treating malignant ascites.

155

浏览量

24

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集